Executed prisoner’s last words…
Posted on | September 22, 2009 | No Comments
Here’s the full article on Time….apparently as we leave this world, we think of the ones who put us out there.
I am taking it like a man.
Kick the tires and light the fire. I am going home.
They may execute me but they can’t punish me because they can’t execute an innocent man.
I couldn’t do a life sentence.
I said I was going to tell a joke. Death has set me free. That’s the biggest joke.
To my sweet Claudia, I love you.
Cathy, you know I never meant to hurt you.
I love you, Irene.
Let my son know I love him.
Tell everyone I got full on chicken and pork chops.
I appreciate the hospitality that you guys have shown me and the respect, and the last meal was really good.
The reason it took them so long is because they couldn’t find a vein. You know how I hate needles. … Tell the guys on Death Row that I’m not wearing a diaper.
Lord, I lift your name on high.
From Allah we came and to Allah we shall return.
For everybody incarcerated, keep your heads up.
ButDoesItFloat on maps
Posted on | August 26, 2009 | No Comments
“What is on the paper map is a representation of what was in the retinal representation of the man who made the map; and as you push the question back, what you find is an infinite regress, an infinite series of maps.”
101 amazing patterns from Nicolaz Groll
Posted on | August 2, 2009 | No Comments
I really love these patterns, they almost look like they were printed on a nice textured yellow paper.
Go check out his website, here and the pattern gallery here. It’s really worth it.
Voltage from Bam Studio
Posted on | July 29, 2009 | No Comments
Voltage from Bam Studio on Vimeo.
Just like modular synthesizers, people connect with each other in order to achieve diverse objectives. In Voltage, robots, half-human and half-synthesizer, powered by a huge amount of energy, connect to each other in an electric and chaotic trance.
Beauty vs ugliness – Amélie Nothomb : Attentat
Posted on | July 21, 2009 | No Comments
If you can read french, a great little book that made me laugh a lot – most of the time by its overexagerrated cynical dialogues.
La première fois que je me vis dans un miroir, je ris : je ne croyais pas que c’était moi. A présent, quand je regarde mon reflet, je ris : je sais que c’est moi. Et tant de hideur a quelque chose de drôle. ” Epiphane Otos serait-il condamné par sa laideur à vivre exclu de la société des hommes et interdit d’amour ? Devenu la star – paradoxale – d’une agence de top models, Epiphane sera tour à tour martyr et bourreau, ambassadeur de la monstruosité internationale… et amoureux de la divine Ethel, une jeune comédienne émue par sa hideur. Sur un thème éternel, la romancière d’Hygiène de l’assassin et des Catilinaires nous offre un conte cruel et drôle, à la fois distancié et tendre
New York City Pictures
Posted on | July 20, 2009 | No Comments
If you’re confused about McLuhan and The medium is the message, read this
Posted on | July 20, 2009 | No Comments
A great article by Marc Feredman. I wrote a post about McLuhan stuff earlier but I think this small essay sums it up very nicely – this guy is obviously a pro (euphemism for PhD candidate at UT), so you should read it, very interesting.
Of all the Internet searches that end up at the McLuhan Program website and weblog, the search for the meaning of the famous “McLuhan Equation” is the most frequent. Many people presume the conventional meaning for “medium” that refers to the mass-media of communications – radio, television, the press, the Internet. And most apply our conventional understanding of “message” as content or information. Putting the two together allows people to jump to the mistaken conclusion that, somehow, the channel supersedes the content in importance, or that McLuhan was saying that the information content should be ignored as inconsequential. Often people will triumphantly hail that the medium is “no longer the message,” or flip it around to proclaim that the “message is the medium,” or some other such nonsense. McLuhan meant what he said; unfortunately, his meaning is not at all obvious, and that is where we begin our journey to understanding.
The future of the Internet : why Google Chrome is a girl, and what it means.
Posted on | July 14, 2009 | No Comments
Apparently this is also true now for younger kids. The new generation of children can operate a computer easily and schedule the maintenance scan before they even enroll for kindergarten. The big difference with what happened when I was a kid is that there are things of interest for girls now, especially online. Eight year-olds can shop for all the latest trends and fashion from their homes, and get mom to ship it to their place. Social networking games and interactive Barbie portals seemed to have understood that girls are also using these tools, and in many cases even more than guys. Girls generally have a longer attention span, and can concentrate on many things at once better than guys, who are typically more prone to get distracted at a younger age. I remember earlier this year, I had a roommate who stayed at our place to sublet my friend’s room for a few months, and the days when she wasn’t in school or hanging out with friends, she would be on the computer browsing youtube/facebook/hotmail/msn/twitter/etc. all day. I think it’s safe to say that girls have firmly taken their place in adopting the new digital technologies in the past few years.
Now, Chrome’s share of the market is still fairly low (3% at the time of writing this), but I expect it to grow very fast in the years and even months to come, given Google’s omnipresence in the digital kingdom. Because their search engine was so successful, they managed to introduce a ton of new free products that only made the company more popular. I think the same thing will happen with Chrome soon (like Google maps or Images), especially that they are launching a new OS soon (just announced this week on their blog).
I’ve been using Chrome for many months now, and it’s quite a feat. I’ve been a very very loyal IE user since I know computers for the simple reason that everyone uses it, and since I develop Web applications, I want to know exactly what people will be seeing. what made me switch was speed. Not speed to load webpages (which has mostly to do with connexion speed), but speed to load itself. When I clicked the IE button, it always took 3-4 seconds to load, especially IE 7 and 8, and we all know that 3-4 seconds in Internet time is many light-years of regular time. I use two big flat screens to work, every piece of software is configured and hotkeyed to my liking and I can type very, very fast. Needless to say 3-4 seconds is too long.
When I click my Chrome button, it opens up NOW. It actually doesn’t give me the time to ponder if clicking it was a good decision, because it’s already asking me where I want to go. Saves a few more seconds right there, how convenient. It can read my mind, definitively.
I think we can all agree that Chrome also looks very simple with its minimal design and light theme. But from what I know, most browsers (including Chrome), are very complex once you pop the hood. Yet, all the inner workings are hidden, just to make sure we don’t have to worry about the code crunching that’s going on to display the requested page. Elegant hm? It might be doing a million evil things in your back, but you will never know, just because you don’t need to.
In comparison, Internet Explorer loves to burp out an incoherent ExceptionHandler message at any given opportunity, making you wonder where it got its manners. It’s big, it’s clunky, and it’s slow. And although I’ve been criticizing IE a lot, Firefox is actually very very slow recently, I think they might of caught the Adobe Syndrome (you know, this thing where you need a octo-core computer with 16 gigs of ram to crop the picture of your grandma in CS4?). Even my friends on Macs tell me they can’t stand the Fox anymore and they want a new browser.
One last thing about Chrome. When you go to places it actually remembers. Not only it remembers in the way where it helps you auto-fill the URL box when you type an address, but it also 1) makes the difference between a site that you’ve been to eight hundred times and only once, and it indexes whatever was in the page, so you can just type normal words and it finds the URL for you 2) when you go back to a old tab you just closed (or a page in your history) it also remembers the pages you went just before, so you’re not stuck in that same page wondering why time suddenly stopped when you were on it.
Given my description, I really feel that girls wanting to use a browser will choose Chrome over the others, if they know it exists (which is the problem right now). I think they will identify much more strongly than with IE , Firefox or something else.
Actually, not only do I think Chrome will appeal much to the masses of technologically literate girls, I think Google made it as a girl (consciously or not) – and props to them, it was a great move.
Tags: browsers > chrome > future of the internet > girl > Google > internet
MoMA = Leon Ferrari + Mira Schendel
Posted on | June 16, 2009 | No Comments
I saw one of the best expos in a while at the MoMA in NYC two days ago, the special exhibition featuring Leon Ferrari and Mira Schendel called Tangled Alphabest. They are both South American, and their work speak a lot about language and its representation. The work of Ferrari touched me more than Schendel’s, but the whole thing was great nonetheless.
Back from NYC
Posted on | June 16, 2009 | No Comments
I was just in NYC for a few days, so will probably be posting images from there in a bit, it was great. I visited NYU’s ITP program which turned out to be an awesome place, hopefully I can make it for next year…
keep looking »


















































































































